Back to top
Back to top

Part A Results and Feedback

Marking

Papers are anonymised and marked by examiners working individually.

The process of marking Part A examination questions and reaching agreement as to the final mark on each question for each candidate is as follows:

  • For Paper I, two examiners each mark two questions, that is pair A mark questions 1 & 2, pair B mark questions 3 & 4, etc.
  • For Paper II, two examiners each mark Paper IIA and two different examiners each mark Paper IIB.

A total of 14 examiners are therefore involved in marking the examination scripts from each sitting of the Part A. This process ensures that each script is double marked.

Each examiner marks their allotted scripts independently. Questions in Paper I are each marked out of 10, while each section (A & B) of Paper II is marked out of 50. Examiners mark against the mark scheme and initially 'blind' to the pass mark and their colleague examiner's mark.

Only once both examiners have completed their marking are they supplied with (1) the pass mark for each question marked and (2) the marks of their co-examiner.

The paired examiners then discuss and compare their results in order to reach a set of agreed marks for each script. The two agreed marks from each examiner are averaged to derive the final mark for that question for each candidate.

Before submitting their agreed marks, examiners need to ensure that their two separate marks comply with certain rules:

  • In Paper I, the two marks may not differ by more than two points (eg. a five and a seven is satisfactory but not a five and an eight).
  • In Paper II, the two marks may not differ by more than five points (10%).
  • In either paper, the two marks may not constitute a difference between a pass and a fail, ie. they must both be either pass marks or fail marks, eg. 3 & 4, or 5 & 6, but not 4 & 5  (where the pass mark was 5, as an example or in Paper II: 23 & 24, or 25 & 26, but not 24 & 25 (where the pass mark was 25, as an example).

If their individual marks do not meet these rules, the examiners discuss how they reached their marks on those candidates' papers. This may sometimes lead to one or both of the examiners agreeing to change their mark(s) to ensure the rules are met (either by increasing or decreasing), or they may agree to re-mark that candidate's paper. Re-marking is often carried out when the results span the pass/fail borderline. The results following re-marking are again compared and any remaining discrepancies are re-discussed. This process continues until the rules are met, which is usually achieved within two reviews.

The final mark on each paper for every candidate sitting the examination is individually discussed and agreed at the Examinations Board meeting. Candidates must pass both Paper I and Paper II separately in order to pass overall. For further details see the Part A marking algorithm used by the Executive Examiners.

Back to top

Extenuating Circumstances

Candidates may inform FPH of serious circumstances that occurred on the date of the examination and that adversely affected their examination performance, by submitting an extenuating circumstances form.

Back to top

Notification

Examination results will be sent first class and marked "private and confidential" within three days of the Part A results meeting. From January 2018, results will also be emailed to the address on the application form if requested. A pass list and results summary will also be published on the FPH website on the second Monday following the Part A results meeting. Examination results will not be given over the telephone. Results are not posted in the FPH premises.

The result for all candidates will be sent to Faculty Advisers and Programme Directors.

All candidates who are unsuccessful in the examination will receive feedback on their examination performance in the form of marks as well as examiners' general comments about overall question performance. Candidates will not receive detailed individual feedback.

Back to top

Banking

It is possible to 'bank' papers at Part A. This means that if the candidate does not pass the examination but has passed an individual paper, this result can be banked so that the candidate need not sit this paper again. This is feasible due to the explicit separation of knowledge and skills between Papers I and II.

Please note the following:

  • An individual paper (I or II) may be banked only when it has been passed.
  • As of January 2017, FPH no longer stipulates that candidates who bank a paper at a sitting must then sit the remaining paper at each subsequent examination. The limit on holding a banked paper is now one year (two sittings). If the candidate requires longer then they should submit a statement from their educational supervisor or training programme director which will be considered by the Part A Chair. This is because any longer than a year is likely to impact on training progress.
  • There will be no change in the examination fees for sittings of individual papers.
  • Candidates must continue to take both parts (papers) of the examination at the same sitting, unless a paper has been banked previously.

Back to top

Appeals

Candidates who wish to appeal against their examination results should consult the appeal procedures.

Back to top

Latest Results

Examination date: June 2017

Results summary
Candidates who sat the examination 77
Candidates who passed 51
Candidates who failed 13
Candidates who banked Paper I 9
Candidates who banked Paper II 4
% who banked a paper 16.88%
% who banked a paper or passed 83.11%
Pass rate* 66.23%
Candidates who sat the examination in UK public health training
52
Candidates who passed 40
Candidates who banked a paper 9
% who banked a paper or passed 94.23%
Pass rate for those in UK public health training schemes* 76.92%
* Please note that this pass rate also includes candidates who have passed as a result of banking a previous paper
Successful Candidates
(Please note that candidates have received official notification by post and that this list does not include those candidates who have opted not to have their names published)
Mr James Adamson Dr Alberto Mateo Urdiales
Ms Matilda Allen Dr Ailsa McKay
Ms Laura Austin Croft Dr Christine McKee
Ms Karen Buckley Dr Ali Murad
Dr Frances Butcher Miss Grace Norman
Mrs Rebecca Campbell Dr Amy Phillips
Dr Joht Chandan Dr Helena Posnett
Dr Wai Cheung Dr William Proto
Dr Katherine Comer Dr Alice Puchades
Ms Aideen Dunne Dr Selina Rajan
Dr Catherine Flanigan Mrs Leila Reid
Dr Laura French
Dr Benjamin Rush
Dr Kathryn Hamilton Dr Yuen Shan Lam
Mrs Zara Hammond Dr Alexandra Smith
Ms Megan Harris Mrs Jennifer Taylor
Mrs Siobhan Horsley Dr Rachel Thomson
Dr Wikum Jayatunga Dr Alicia Thornton
Dr Waqar Khurshid Ms Miranda Trevor
Dr Farah Kidy Miss Ceriann Tunnah
Dr Amir Kirolos Dr Sarah Wilkinson
Dr Hannah Maiden Dr Constance Wou
Dr Kathleen Mark Dr Hin Yam Zenith Wu
Dr Mahiben Maruthappu Dr Wing Man Yu
   

View archived Part A Results

Back to top


Back to top Back to Exams